If anyone has time this week, there are about 100 tickets that need to be reviewed for potential 3.2 issues we missed. The first page of Report 40 lists “Defects Awaiting Review, reported against trunk” and “Defects Awaiting Review, reported against no version.”
Basically, we’re just looking for bugs to 3.2 features, and regressions. Many of these either need the version numbers dropped (or added) or converted to enhancements. If someone wants to do full triage, ping me or someone in IRC and we’ll arrange milestone adjustments.
Update: Specifics on how to help.
-
The Version field is for the earliest known version that the ticket affects. For bugs, this would be the version to which it applies or was introduced. All the ones that say “3.2,” if they aren’t new bugs in 3.2, then they should be changed to 3.1 or, for extra credit, earlier.
-
If the ticket is pushing for an enhancement, rather than reporting a bug, then simply change the Type field to “enhancement.” (Rarely “feature request,” never “task.”)
(Contributors who have participated on Trac before will of course know to adjust keywords, perhaps even adjust milestones and what not. But these are two simple ways to help clean up this report.)
Christopher 5:43 pm on June 22, 2011 Permalink |
Andrew, I noticed this today while updating a plugin, it’s a great added feature! Thanks.
Denis 8:42 am on June 23, 2011 Permalink |
Any plans to switch the plugin repo to git at some point?
Peter Westwood 8:47 am on June 23, 2011 Permalink |
Nope
Ramoonus 12:19 pm on June 26, 2011 Permalink |
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-svn.html
Denis 9:51 pm on June 26, 2011 Permalink
There actually is a much better intake here: http://teleogistic.net/2011/05/revisiting-git-github-and-the-wordpress-org-plugin-repository/ – but it would still be quite neat if, instead of svn, WP was using git in the first place.
Andrew Nacin 6:36 am on June 28, 2011 Permalink
We wouldn’t move the plugins directory to git without moving everything to git, and there are no plans to do that.
arena 11:23 pm on June 30, 2011 Permalink |
I appreciate this
But :
mails sent are only html (plaintext not supported)
i don’t know how they look like in other mail readers but in gmail they look ugly (most of the css is discarded).
Alex M. 12:02 am on July 1, 2011 Permalink |
http://daryl.learnhouston.com/2011/06/01/legible-svn-diffs-in-gmail/
Brian Layman 11:40 pm on July 7, 2011 Permalink |
I got my first one of these yesterday. These are really slick! they look great!